| |
Home |
Origins and Explanation | Illustrated History | A Fascinating and Stimulating Exchange: Dart's and the Murrays' Correspondence:
1967 1968 1969 1970s |
Just let it all wash over you | The Double Spiral |
Beginning from the Beginning |
Links |
The Dart Procedures A Fascinating and Stimulating Exchange: Raymond Dart's and Alex and Joan Murrays' Correspondence
A key part of the collaboration of Raymond Dart with Alex and Joan Murray was their written correspondence during the 1960s and 1970s. The following is much of the written correspondence between Raymond Dart and Alexander and Joan Murray from 1967 to 1971. Most of the letters were handwritten and have been transcribed from xerox copies by Marian Goldberg. The typewritten letters are scans of xeroxes of the originals. One hand printed letter from Alex Murray to Dart has been scanned from a xerox copy. This material has been generously provided by the Murrays. 1967 Dart/Murray Correspondence 1968 Dart/Murray Correspondence 1969 Dart/Murray Correspondence 1970s Dart/Murray Correspondence
Raymond Dart and Alexander and Joan Murray Correspondence 1969
19-11-69 Dear Joan & Alex,
IAHP Dear Alex, I was glad to have your letter before our leaving for South Africa early next Monday. The comments of your students upon The Significance of Skill are very interesting & are so revelatory that the exercise you set for them to perform must have been helpful to each one of them in these “no essays in examinations” days. Perhaps the greater use of the voice by Bantu speaking people, who have not had the voice-destroying influence of writing & the written word operating upon them, is a factor along with singing & dancing in promoting laryngeal & respiratory as well as muscular efficiency in affecting the form & strength of their hyoid bone. I am sorry to have written so many things about the matters in which you have been interested but the human body took a long time to emerge & followed such a fantastic path of decisions & alterations in coming into being that the miracle is in our even having arrived at the stage of visualizing the process at all; & of course we never could have reached it without the discoveries of speech & music (or rhythm & b___ & pipes & drums), of alphabets (after hieroglyphs, etc. [and the Rosetta Stone etc. etc.]), of the sciences (physics, chem, botany, zoology, geology, paleontology, etc) & of the humanities (languages, social organisation, art, religion). The big thing now amidst the oceanic future of scientific fact will be the individual’s keeping his head above the water; & maybe this is what you & your students are discovering to be necessary. Have you ever looked at Lloyd S. Woodburne’s The Neural Basis of Behavior, Charles E Merrill Books, Inc. Columbus, Ohio, 1967. 378 pp. It is a digest of the nervous system written for psychologists. If it had been expanded to include the musculature it would have served the needs of artists like musicians & dancers etc. It may _____ introductory chart of development such as you have in mind would certainly be useful. Why not try your own hand at writing it & constructing whatever glossary would be needed. There are 7 cervical vertebrae but there have to be 8 cervical nerves because if you called the one supplying the muscles connected atlas to cranium you obviously needed an eighth one to supply the muscles connecting the 7th vertebrae to the first rib. The vertebrae & ribs are intersegmental structures contributed in part from the bottom (or posterior) part of the segment above (i.e. in front) & in part from the top (or anterior) part of the segment below (i.e. behind). The sensory & muscular & neural tube segment (or neuromere) are the segmental substance proper. There does seem to be a relationship between the ________ of nerve fibres (or their myelin sheaths) & the distance (as well as the speed with which) the impulses they transmit travel but I am not acquainted with the authority you quote or the HM Index of _____ involved in phonation. It sounds very feasible. I have no objection to your familiarizing McConnel or our friends in London with such parts of the address as you feel may be valuable for them to know beforehand. The only thing is that those who attend may find what I have to say boring, or that others stay away because they have heard it already. But I leave that to your own judgment, like the overlooked uvula; why interfere with nature until circumstances demand it? I see no need. The rotation of the spinal vertebrae relative to one another is a flexor pulling (e.g. of intercostals, etc.) which operates on the transverse processes of the (e.g. lumbar) vertebrae, which is not resisted by any of the extensors; or it is an extensor pulling on the ribs (or shoulders or neck) unopposed by the flexors. They are mass movements of all the segments that happen to be involved & result in merely a partial twist in each segment of the flexor-extensor segmental muscles involved. The rotation of the atlas is around its own body [which became detached from it & was transformed into the dens (or tooth) of the axis vertebrae so extensor muscles operating from skull & axis on the transverse process oppose one another; the left group contracting while the right relax & vice versa. And while it is rotating the head can be nodding fore & aft on the atlas! These are the things that are unique. A merry Xmas & a great 1970 for all three of you from all here. Yours sincerely,
Return to:
|